Find something wrong in this description?  Help us fix it! 
Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn

Why does PolySpace 5.1.1 (R2008a) show a red non-terminating loop (NTL) check in my code?

Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn

My C code looks as follows. When I run a PolySpace verification, the "for" keyword that is mentioned in the comments is marked red with a message that the loop never terminates. Also, I get another red check for a underflow error. I am using the option "-detect-unsigned-overflows".

int main () {
    int intC;
    unsigned int uintA, uintB, i = 0;
    uintA = 20;
    uintB = 30;
    intC = 10;
    // The following keyword "for" is marked with
    // a red NTL check.
    for(i; i < 10; i++) {
      // Subtraction marked with a red UNFL check
      // for a possible underflow.
      if ((uintA - uintB) < uintC) { // UNFL: 20 - 30
        //...
      }
    }
}

Tags

No tags entered yet.

II BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer Kilmer UGG UGG Kilmer UGG II
Black Dress Johnston Barlow Full Casual Full Slip Venetian Grain GrainDark amp; Brown On Murphy x44q7W8T

1 Answer

Answer by MathWorks Support Team Kilmer UGG II Kilmer BlackDove UGG BlackDove II Kilmer UGG on 27 Jun 2009
  Accepted Answer

The red NTL check is caused by the red underflow check (UNFL) within the loop. Correcting the code that causes the UNFL check or removing the option "-detect-unsigned-overflows" will cause the NTL check to disappear.

  0 Comments

Sign in to comment.